THE DONEGAL Remembrance 10K took place in the Twin Towns today, once again hosted by the Finn Valley AC Club.It was an opportunity for people to remember loved ones – and raise a few euro for good causes. (PIX CONOR McGONAGLE) Place Race No. Time FirstName Surname Category Club 1 596 34.10 Gerard Gallagher SM Finn Valley A C2 312 34.13 Paul Ward SM Individual3 282 34.26 Shane McNulty SM Finn Valley A C4 590 34.31 Keiran Crawford SM Letterkenny A C 5 329 34.44 Kevin Ferry SM Letterkenny A C6 592 34.44 Paul McGlinchey SM Letterkenny A C7 296 35.56 Teresa McGloin SW Finn Valley A C8 305 35.57 Kieran Carlin SM Finn Valley A C9 647 37.00 Paul Murray SM Finn Valley A C 10 279 37.05 Kieran Callaghan SM Individual11 154 37.06 Seamus O’Donnell SM Convoy12 507 37.22 Niall Barry SM Letterkenny A C13 589 38.02 Mark McPaul SM Finn Valley A C 14 517 38.05 Shane Gallagher SM Individual15 508 38.13 Padraig Friel SM Letterkenny A C16 568 38.16 Kieran Reynolds SM Individual17 2817 38.19 Aaron McBride SM Individual18 12 38.26 Anne Turbett SW Individual19 563 38.46 Marty McCrossan SM Individual20 580 38.47 Damien McBride SM Milford A C21 117 38.50 Patrick Toye SM Individual22 582 38.51 Gareth Kerrigan SM Milford A C23 576 38.52 Kenneth O’Donnell M40 Finn Valley A C24 543 38.59 Michael Gallagher SM Finn Valley A C25 642 39.02 Raymond McGahey SM Individual26 218 39.07 Derek Callaghan SM Finn Valley A C27 348 39.07 Patrick McGlynn SM Individual28 255 39.11 Hugh Coll M40 Individual29 514 39.11 Brian Doherty SM Milford A C30 571 39.13 Eugene Gallen SM Individual31 501 39.23 Liam Murray SM Individual32 276 40.04 Brian McCrea M35 Individual33 341 40.13 Manus McBride SM Individual34 597 40.15 Catriona Devine SW Finn Valley A C35 257 40.15 Kay Byrne SW Finn Valley A C36 307 40.18 Catherine Dooher SW Finn Valley A C37 2819 40.29 Charlie Page SM Letterkenny A C38 581 40.29 Gabriel O’Leary SM Finn Valley A C39 163 40.29 Eamon Cush M45 Individual40 502 40.30 Alan Catterson M40 Finn Valley A C41 527 40.31 Michael McHugh SM Milford A C42 292 40.35 Ray McGrory SM Milford A C43 506 40.36 Paul Cosgrove SM Letterkenny A C44 579 40.39 Warren Blackburn SM Convoy45 286 40.41 Martin Anderson SM Finn Valley A C46 283 40.42 Kathleen McNulty SW Finn Valley A C47 288 40.43 Raymona Doherty SW Finn Valley A C48 4 40.44 Patrick Gallagher SM Individual49 166 40.56 Dominic Carlin M45 Lifford A C50 618 41.08 Liam McGinty SM Finn Valley A C51 355 41.29 Declan McHugh SM Individual52 345 41.55 Sean Byrne SM Finn Valley A C53 237 41.56 Andy Scanlon M45 Finn Valley A C54 308 41.57 Sean McDaid SM Individual55 358 42.04 Ronan Frain SM Finn Valley A C56 632 42.12 PJ Friel SM Individual57 623 42.22 Sean Boyce SM Individual58 246 42.27 Noreen Bonner W55 Individual59 545 42.28 Richard Duncan SM Castlefinn Runners60 165 42.32 Gerard Campbell SM Lifford A C61 298 42.36 Aaron Moore SM Finn Valley A C62 395 42.44 Mark logue SM Convoy63 578 42.50 Simon Stevens SM Individual64 635 42.52 John Coyle SM Lifford A C65 515 42.56 Barry Gallagher SM Individual66 620 43.00 Michael Gallagher SM Individual67 539 43.12 Paul Doherty SM Individual68 350 43.14 Peter McMenamin SM Individual69 386 43.28 Marie Harper SW Finn Valley A C70 297 43.29 Gareth McLaughlin SM Individual71 591 43.30 Adrian McHugh SM Individual72 606 43.31 Darren Magurie SM Individual73 640 43.32 Pauric McNern SM Individual74 309 43.43 Danny McDaid SM Individual75 215 43.49 Declan Carlin SM Individual76 560 43.59 Conner McGonagle SM Finn Valley A C77 321 44.13 Nuala O’Hagan SW Milford A C78 197 44.16 Karin Duffner W40 Finn Valley A C79 392 44.19 James Callaghan SM Individual80 569 44.21 Patrick McNamee SM Individual81 526 44.22 Ciaran McHugh SM Individual82 388 44.47 Emeka Omwunzo SM Individual83 34 44.48 Kieran McGee SM Individual84 522 44.51 Michael McMenamin SM Finn Valley A C85 248 44.52 Paul Smith M40 Trim AC86 351 44.55 Gavin Harris SM Individual87 285 44.59 Maurice O’Donnell SM Individual88 325 45.00 Joe Gavin SM Lifford A C89 254 45.04 Philip Browne SM Individual90 51 45.15 Duane Long SM Finn Valley A C91 599 45.27 Oisin Kelly SM Individual92 277 45.36 Garvin Boyce M40 Individual93 382 45.53 Martin Bonner SM Finn Valley A C94 376 45.56 Donal Rowan SM Finn Valley A C95 612 45.59 AnneMarie Dalton SW Finn Valley A C96 613 46.00 Terry McDevitt SM Individual97 334 46.07 Seamus Curran SM Finn Valley A C98 535 46.19 Patrick McNulty SM Individual99 322 46.28 Margaret Shiels SW Letterkenny A C100 295 46.28 James McGuire SM Finn Valley A C101 159 46.35 Mark Glen SM Convoy102 525 46.44 James Doherty SM Milford A C103 335 46.45 Rachel Crossan SW Individual104 336 46.47 Brian Crossan SM Individual105 337 46.51 Mark Harkin SM Convoy106 256 46.53 Danny Gamble SM Individual107 564 47.01 Paddy Gildea SM Individual108 252 47.17 Adrian Devine SM Individual109 399 47.22 Gareth Patton SM Convoy110 160 47.24 Don Smyth SM Convoy111 287 47.27 Maria Boyle SW Finn Valley A C112 177 47.29 Eamonn McConnell SM Castlefinn Runners113 536 47.45 John Doherty SM Individual114 360 47.46 Conor Callaghan SM Individual115 367 47.48 Megan Dowling SW Individual116 144 47.49 Carl Houston SM Castlefinn Runners117 144 47.49 Carrie-Ann Towey SW Individual118 232 47.51 Joanne Campbell SW Individual119 216 47.53 Joe Carlin SM Individual120 553 47.54 Lochlann O’Rourke SM Individual121 361 47.55 Jason Regan SM Individual122 575 48.01 Cathal McBride SM Convoy123 362 48.02 John Byrne SM Individual124 601 48.04 Catherine Regan SW Letterkenny A C125 294 48.08 Liam McMullan SM Individual126 628 48.12 Conal Gallagher SM Individual127 323 48.14 Mairead Quinn SW Letterkenny A C128 171 48.22 Andy Parkinson SM Convoy129 638 48.28 Mark Gildea SM Individual130 233 48.29 Caroline McNulty SW Individual131 643 48.30 Denis McGill SM Individual132 394 48.34 PJ McMenamin SM Individual133 354 48.37 Stephen Steward SM Individual134 311 48.38 Noel Duffy SM Individual135 387 48.39 Danny McBride SM Convoy136 210 48.43 Goretti Marley SW Finn Valley A C137 393 48.47 Emmet O’Donnell SM Individual138 303 48.51 Karl Doherty SM Lifford A C139 324 48.52 Joe McNulty SM Lifford A C140 538 48.55 Ursula Coyle SW Lifford A C141 302 48.55 Liam Harte SM Lifford A C142 157 48.56 Joe Gallen M55 Lifford A C143 2929 49.13 Eloise Carlin SW Individual144 207 49.35 Adam Noonan Sweeney JM Finn Valley A C145 375 49.45 Frankie Kelly SM Individual146 221 49.45 Eugene McGinley M45 Raphoe Roadrunners147 258 49.45 Rachel Bell SW Raphoe Roadrunners148 220 49.50 Barry O’Donnell SM Convoy149 385 49.52 Stephen O’Donnell SM Individual150 212 49.56 Evelyn McGeehan W45 Finn Valley A C151 566 49.56 Packie Bonner SM Individual152 203 50.01 Kathleen Gallen W45 Finn Valley A C153 528 50.01 Christina Lynch SW Individual154 304 50.05 Aisling Kelly SW Individual155 240 50.12 Caroline McGuire SW Finn Valley A C156 523 50.12 Joanne Campell SW Finn Valley A C157 547 50.29 Aiden Dorrian SM Individual158 243 50.50 Francessca Patton SW Individual159 554 50.52 Jimmy White SM Killybegs A C160 593 50.53 Yvonne O’Donnell SW Milford A C161 211 50.54 Mary Martin w60 Finn Valley A C162 201 50.55 Emma Speight SW Finn Valley A C163 533 50.57 Liam Daly SM Lifford A C164 35 50.58 Kieran McCafferty SM Individual165 550 51.09 Emma Boyle SW Individual166 646 51.10 Danielle Boyle SW Individual167 316 51.11 Sinead Kenny SM Finn Valley A C168 316 51.11 CarrieAnn Toney SW Individual169 630 51.19 Oisin Doherty SM Individual170 520 51.22 John McElwaine SM Lifford A C171 559 51.24 Edith Neely SW Individual172 198 51.26 Helene McMenamin SW Finn Valley A C173 648 51.43 Alen Cunningham SM Individual174 330 51.54 Bernie Crossan SW Finn Valley A C175 595 51.54 Gemma McGlinchey SW Convoy176 227 52.03 Aoife McGranaghan SW Raphoe Roadrunners177 549 52.03 Michelle Delaney SW Individual178 2925 52.07 Fiona Boland SW Individual179 241 52.12 Olivia Gillen SW Convoy180 603 52.31 Gerry Maguire SM Individual181 604 52.31 JP maguire SM Individual182 605 52.31 David Maguire SM Individual183 602 52.31 Michael Maguire SM Individual184 505 52.31 Evelyn Boyle SW Individual185 573 52.31 Joseph Casey M40 Individual186 331 52.31 Angela Trimble SW Individual187 633 53.21 Mary McFeeley SW Individual188 636 53.27 Derek McDermott SM Individual189 314 53.28 Cora Harvey SW Finn Valley A C190 634 53.39 Marie McColgan SW Finn Valley A C191 542 53.39 Eileen Morning SW Individual192 291 53.43 Emer Alexander SW Castlefinn Runners193 570 53.45 Amanda McBrearty SW Individual194 352 53.49 Sinead McMenamin SW Castlefinn Runners195 192 53.49 Marcella McBride SW Castlefinn Runners196 170 53.57 Jane Flannery SW Individual197 77 53.59 Paula Jansen SW Finn Valley A C198 14 54.01 Kieran O’Leary SM Inishowen A C199 33 54.05 Leona McGee SW Individual200 289 54.20 Diane Gallagher SW Finn Valley A C201 153 54.21 Grace O’Donnell SW Convoy202 516 54.29 Paul Gallagher SM Individual203 512 55.19 Richard Sleigh SM Individual204 379 55.21 Ruth MCCrudden SW Letterkenny A C205 380 55.21 George Russell SM Individual206 510 55.25 Liam Gallagher SM Individual207 15 55.31 Annmarie Roche SW Individual208 13 55.31 Joey O’Leary SM Individual209 132 55.31 Ann Foy SW Individual210 133 55.31 Patrick Foy SM Individual211 577 55.31 Janet Boyle SW Individual212 381 55.39 Kieran McHale SM Finn Valley A C213 230 55.43 Melissa Gibson SW Raphoe Roadrunners214 5 55.47 Keith McBrearty M40 Lifford A C215 274 55.49 Deirdre Friel SW Raphoe Roadrunners216 290 55.50 Aisling McDevitt SW Finn Valley A C217 609 56.20 Michael Duffy SM Individual218 47 56.26 Kerry Lee Rowan SW Castlefinn Runners219 546 56.27 Laura Whiteduncan SW Castlefinn Runners220 534 56.35 Margaret Doherty SW Individual221 567 56.36 Dymphna Bonner SW Individual222 320 56.37 Arthur Connelly SM Individual223 608 56.38 Simon McDevitt SM Individual224 204 56.43 Dolours McGlinchey SW Finn Valley A C225 509 56.44 Tamara Harvey SW Individual226 340 56.45 William Porter SM Convoy227 2834 56.47 Jimmy Gildea SM Letterkenny A C228 224 56.56 Margaret Slevin SW Raphoe Roadrunners229 172 56.56 Rosemary Parkinson SW Convoy230 2927 56.56 Jackie Long SW Individual231 46 56.57 Annmarie Lynch SW Individual232 213 56.58 Audrey Crawford W40 Finn Valley A C233 639 57.06 Kate Boyce SW Individual234 293 57.06 Marie Boyle SW Finn Valley A C235 649 57.11 Denise Moss SW Finn Valley A C236 196 57.18 Siobhan Houston SW Finn Valley A C237 615 57.18 Lorna O’Donnell SW Rosses A.C.238 561 57.20 Emer McLaughlin SW Finn Valley A C239 342 57.23 Maria Bonner SW Individual240 161 57.26 Kayleigh Smyth SW Convoy241 278 57.38 Carmel Brindle W40 Lifford A C242 364 57.39 Carmel Boland SW Finn Valley A C243 2930 57.42 PJ Sweeney SM Individual244 524 57.44 Ann Doherty SW Milford A C245 208 57.49 Patricia Houston SW Finn Valley A C246 530 57.55 Karen Carlin SW Lifford A C247 253 57.55 Margaret Crossan SW Raphoe Roadrunners248 229 57.59 Paul Brolly SM Raphoe Roadrunners249 199 58.14 Denise McGranaghan SW Finn Valley A C250 562 58.17 Maureen Doherty SW Rosses A.C.251 583 58.24 James Campbell SM Lifford A C252 343 58.25 Sonya McGrory SW Inishowen A C253 9 58.29 Louise Mailey SW Convoy254 242 58.33 Paula O’Donnell SW Convoy255 187 58.35 Julie McNamee SW Castlefinn Runners256 173 58.37 Emma Mungur SW Convoy257 82 58.38 Nicky Maguire SM Individual258 574 58.39 Eloise Gillespie SW Individual259 86 58.45 David Galna SM Individual260 356 58.50 Margaret Gallen SW Finn Valley A C261 150 58.56 Brid McCafferty SW Convoy262 629 58.56 Dolina Laird SW Convoy263 8 58.59 John Mailey SM Convoy264 389 58.59 Tanya Carson SW Individual265 398 59.00 Colin McDaid SM Individual266 2924 59.07 Anthoney Boland SM Individual267 600 59.08 Rosemary Monaghan SW Individual268 339 59.17 Grace Garvey SW Rosses A.C.269 156 59.18 Antoinette Coyle SW Individual270 152 59.19 Ciara Lynch SW Convoy271 167 59.21 Grainne McElhinney SW Individual272 537 59.33 Emer Martin SW Raphoe Roadrunners273 313 59.33 Kay Bonner SW Finn Valley A C274 71 59.33 Louise Goudie SW Individual275 225 59.42 Michelle Temple SW Raphoe Roadrunners276 280 59.42 Mary T Gallagher SW Individual277 614 59.42 Marie Gallagher SW Finn Valley A C278 281 59.44 Liam McLaughlin M50 Individual279 235 60.00 Karina McMenamin SW Individual280 529 60.01 Jackie Harvey SW Castlefinn Runners281 182 60.02 Ann Marie O’Hagan SW Castlefinn Runners282 84 60.03 Charlotte Kane SW Individual283 194 60.03 Selena McGowan SW Finn Valley A C284 234 60.04 Tina McGlynn SW Individual285 186 60.05 Lisa McGlinchey SW Castlefinn Runners286 2812 60.06 Leanne Duffy SW Individual287 621 60.21 Patricia McLauglin SW Inishowen A C288 193 60.23 Nicole Kee SW Finn Valley A C289 70 60.47 Frances Wilson SW Finn Valley A C290 54 60.53 Julie Doherty SW Individual291 377 60.55 Alan Mailey SM Convoy292 617 61.01 Amanda Johnson SW Convoy293 306 61.04 Sarah Toye McLaughlin SW Individual294 616 61.11 Carroll Ann Scott SW Convoy295 357 61.24 Bernie Frain SW Individual296 56 61.28 Annmarie Walsh SW Individual297 551 61.32 Loretta Devenny SW Individual298 222 61.41 Shauna Coyle SW Raphoe Roadrunners299 598 61.48 Michelle Rouse SW Lifford A C300 219 61.49 Rosemary Boggs W50 Lifford A C301 353 61.50 Martin Dolan SM Finn Valley A C302 378 62.21 Jackie Toland SW Convoy303 145 62.27 Donal Bonner SM Finn Valley A C304 122 62.34 Monica Cavanagh SW Individual305 249 62.39 Lorraine McCool SW Individual306 319 62.44 Kevin McHugh SM Finn Valley A C307 644 62.49 Patrick Coyle SM Individual308 284 62.55 Martin McDevitt SM Individual309 622 62.57 Madeline Redmonds SW Inishowen A C310 572 62.59 Rose Crampsie SW Individual311 244 62.59 Edel Page SW Individual312 223 63.01 Enda Slevin SM Raphoe Roadrunners313 72 63.02 Debbie Campbell SW Individual314 73 63.16 Michelle McBrearty SW Individual315 565 63.20 Katriona McDaid SW Individual316 627 63.20 Clarie Irwing SW Individual317 349 63.49 Michelle McMenamin SW Individual318 158 64.03 Julie Cole SW Convoy319 585 64.12 Daniella Preston SW Individual320 178 64.12 Mary McGranaghan SW Castlefinn Runners321 641 64.15 Tracey Matthewson SW Castlefinn Runners322 328 64.44 Anne Turbett SW Individual323 611 64.50 Angela MCConnell SW Castlefinn Runners324 146 64.50 Corrina Catterson Flynn SW Castlefinn Runners325 147 64.58 Mick Flynn SM Castlefinn Runners326 119 65.47 Madge Toye Temple SW Individual327 610 65.58 Elaine Grant SW Finn Valley A C328 317 66.00 Elin Gallen SW Finn Valley A C329 115 66.01 Lucinda Nash SW Individual330 344 66.15 Martin McCool SM Individual331 179 66.22 Fionuala McBride SW Castlefinn Runners332 236 67.00 Sharon Scanlon W45 Finn Valley A C333 318 67.18 Dean Harvey SM Finn Valley A C334 315 67.48 Betty Gallen SW Finn Valley A C335 607 67.48 Finn Gallagher SM Individual336 148 68.45 Donna Curran SW Castlefinn Runners337 251 69.15 Loretta McNulty SW Castlefinn Runners338 513 69.16 Erin Toye JW Finn Valley A C339 228 69.33 Christine Brolly SW Raphoe Roadrunners340 226 69.35 Sinead Kelly SW Raphoe Roadrunners341 113 70.00 Martin Towey SM Individual342 130 71.14 Emma Lawrenece SW Individual343 645 71.28 John Duffy SM Individual344 60 71.29 Shauna McGettigan SW Individual345 136 71.29 Keara Bogan SW Individual346 390 71.45 Breege Gillen SW Individual347 391 72.14 Louise Gallen SW Individual348 65 72.14 Rebecca Duffy SW Individual349 584 72.14 Martina Cullen SW Individual350 586 72.30 Pascal Cullen SM Individual351 245 72.30 Gary Lawerence SM Individual352 98 72.30 Caitlin McDaid SW Individual353 100 72.30 Conáire McDaid SM Individual354 92 72.30 Róssa McDaid SW Individual355 91 72.30 Peter McDaid SM Individual356 90 72.48 Lisa McDaid SW Individual357 116 72.48 Aisleen Toye SW Individual358 118 72.48 Christine Toye JW Individual359 504 72.54 Vivienne Merrit W40 Individual360 503 72.54 Caroline Catterson W40 Finn Valley A C361 338 73.30 Teresa McMenamin SW Finn Valley A C362 624 73.30 Kieranna McCormack SW Individual363 206 74.22 Orla Noonan Sweeney SW Finn Valley A C364 619 76.00 Collette Ward SW Individual365 2807 76.00 Marty Carlin SM Individual366 2833 76.00 Colette Carlin SW Individual367 511 76.00 Rosaleen McGonagle Walker Finn Valley A C368 275 76.00 Mary Fury SW Individual369 594 76.49 Noel Melaugh SM Individual370 548 77.17 Charlotte Sweeney SW Individual371 1 77.26 Fintan Mangan SM Individual372 20 78.59 Kathleen O’Leary SW Individual373 26 78.59 Jullie McConnell SW Individual374 27 79.15 Marie Houston SW Individual375 346 79.15 Mary Gallagher SW Individual376 347 80.19 Laura Gallagher SW Individual377 383 83.30 Siobhan Kelly SW Individual378 587 84.47 James McNulty SM Individual379 588 84.47 Rhonda Russell SW Individual380 519 86.00 Martina McElwaine SW Individual381 518 86.00 Lynn Murphy SW Individual382 557 86.25 Donna Whelan SW Individual383 558 86.59 Aoife Whelan SW Individual384 556 86.59 Paul Whelan SW Individual385 168 88.40 Adrian McElhinney Walker Individual386 169 88.40 Meleesa McDaid Walker Individual387 540 90.00 Elaine Melaugh SW Individual388 541 90.00 Andrew Griffith SM Individual389 555 91.00 Noreen Whelan SW Individual390 327 91.00 Donal Cleary SM Individual391 326 91.00 Anne Cleary SW Individual392 2931 91.00 Kathleen Sweeney SW Individual393 544 91.00 Eugene Drumm SM Finn Valley A C394 625 92.10 Laura McGinty SW Individual395 626 92.10 Rylie McGinty SM Individual396 2810 92.20 Sharon McGlinchey SW Individual397 2 92.20 Anne McGowan SW Individual398 631 93.00 Paul Doherty SM Individual399 300 93.00 Elish Doherty SW Individual400 111 94.50 Ciara Wasson SW Individual401 120 94.50 Paul Martin SM Individual402 124 94.50 Lee-Ann Doherty SW Individual403 110 94.50 Siobhan White SW Individual404 123 94.50 Paula Campbell SW Individual405 101 96.00 Bernard Gallagher SM Individual406 102 96.00 Sara Gallagher SW Individual407 2926 96.30 Thomas Callaghan SM Individual408 112 96.30 Sue McGlinchey SW Individual409 137 96.40 Shirley McDaid SW Individual410 384 97.40 Joe Kelly SM Individual411 359 97.40 Donna Gillespie SW Individual412 125 98.34 Roisin McDaid SW Individual413 126 98.34 Erin Doherty SW Individual414 365 99.00 Cecilia Callaghan SW Individual415 107 99.00 Amanda McKnight SW Individual416 106 99.00 William McKnight SM Individual417 127 99.00 Shaun Peoples SM Individual418 108 99.00 Gareth McKnight JM Individual419 521 99.00 Anne Whyte SW Individual420 552 99.00 Geraldine Walker SW IndividualTotal Runners: 420 RESULTS AND PICTURE SPECIAL FROM DONEGAL REMEMBRANCE 10K AT FINN VALLEY AC was last modified: November 24th, 2013 by John2Share this:Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)Click to print (Opens in new window)Tags:Remembrance 10kZach O’Donnell
Tags: 2019 COSAFA Cupabdallah mubiruAllan Kayiwapatrick kadduSebastien DesabretopUganda Cranes Mubiru (2nd Right) during the build-up game against the Senior Cranes team on Thursday, 17th May. (PHOTOS/FUFA)KAMPALA – The COSAFA bound Cranes played their hearts out to hold Uganda’s AFCON bound side to a 1-1 draw in a build-up games played at the Mandela National Stadium in Namboole.In the game played on Thursday afternoon, Allan Kiyiwa handed Abdallah Mubiru’s side a first half lead before Patrick Kaddu equalized for the AFCON team.It was a game that was dominated by the COSAFA team especially in the first half, something the impressed care-taker coach Mubiru.‘It was such a wonderful display from my boys, said Mubiru after the game.“It was a great show against the experienced players and I like the challenge because the AFCON bound team is far much experienced than the COSAFA team.“There is a lot we have learned as the technical team and the players.Mubiru’s team is currently preparing for the 2019 COSAFA Cup that is slated for later this month.They have been in camp since Tuesday and are being accommodated at the Sky Hotel in Naalya.The COSAFA team that started in the Build-up game on Thursday.Uganda was invited to take part in this year’s COSAFA competition that runs from May 20th to June 6th, as the guest Nation.However, they will not feature in the Group stages but will rather start at the quarter final stage.In the Last 8, the Cranes will take on Lesotho, one of the other five nations that will also not be part of the Groups.To complete the squad which initially had 20 players, some of those (players) from the initial preliminary AFCON Squad will be considered for COSAFA tournament, if they don’t travel to the United Arab Emirates (UAE).The senior team will have a training camp in the UAE where they will depart for Abidjan, Ivory Coast before heading to the AFCON finals in Egypt.The team currently preparing for the upcoming COSAFA CupSaid Keni (Sc Villa), Jack Komakech (Ndejje University JT) Willa Paul (Police), Kizza Mustafa (KCCA FC), Revita John (Express FC), Eyam Ivan (Mbarara City FC), Owori David (SC Villa), Bright Anukani (Proline FC), Bashir Mutanda (SC Villa), Mucuurezi Paul (Mbarara City FC), Mbowa Paul Baker (URA FC), Mutyaba Muzamiru (KCCA FC), Isinde Isaac (KJSSS FC), Senkatuka Nelson (Brights Stars FC), Kagimu Shafik (URA FC), Kasozi Nicolas (KCCA FC), Kayiwa Allan (Tooro United FC), Hassan Musana (KCCA FC), Obenchan Filibert (KCCA FC), Birungi Michael (Express FC).Comments
John Terry is due to undergo a scan on his injured ankle on Tuesday.The Chelsea skipper suffered the injury towards the end of the 2-2 draw at Swansea and is a doubt for Friday’s game against Liverpool.Many Blues fans on Twitter have been critical of keeper Thibaut Courtois – and the decision to sell Petr Cech – in the wake of Sunday’s match.QPR also have an injury concern – Sebastian Polter did not train with the rest of the squad on Monday and is a doubt for the match against Newcastle.Polter did not appear for the second half against BlackburnBoth Rangers’ and Fulham’s development sides were in action on Monday evening.Former Tottenham youngster Channing Campbell-Young, who has been on trial with the R’s, featured in a 6-1 defeat at Bolton.Fulham’s Under-23s fared better, beating Aston Villa 3-0 at the Whites’ Motspur Park training ground.Kalas has impressed since joining Fulham on loanMeanwhile, on-loan Chelsea defender Tomas Kalas says he believes Fulham’s squad is stronger than the promotion-winning Middlesbrough one he was part of last season.Chelsea Ladies full-back Hannah Blundell has told West London Sport her team are still very much in the WSL title race.In cricket, half-centuries from Middlesex’s top three put Championship leaders Middlesex into a commanding position against Lancashire at Old Trafford.Follow West London Sport on TwitterFind us on Facebook
“No basis in fact” and “circular reasoning” are some of the phrases in a UK News Telegraph report about the cause of dinosaur extinction, along with words like “feud” and “no consensus” and “doggedly undecided.” Despite the “much-loved disaster movie scenario” of an asteroid impact wiping out the dinosaurs, a significant number of critics dispute the idea. They claim the impact predated the extinction, and even doubt that one theory can explain it.Note the distinction between the real backroom brawls in historical sciences vs. the absolute certainty conveyed in the children’s TV shows. Here is another reason for “teach the controversy.”(Visited 5 times, 1 visits today)FacebookTwitterPinterestSave分享0
SharePrint RelatedMystery at the Museum FAQJune 25, 2019In “News”Breaking news: Opening night at the Teague-Ulmer MuseumAugust 27, 2019In “News”Inside Geocaching HQ Transcript (Episode 26): Mystery at the Museum, Virtual Rewards 2.0 update, 20th Anniversary Celebration, geocaching etiquetteJune 24, 2019In “Podcast” From July 11 to August 11, find clues to track down the stolen jewels. Once you have found the jewels, return them to the vault using the hidden code changed by the thieves.In exchange for your investigative help, you will be rewarded with four new souvenirs.Here’s what we know so far: Two thieves gained entry to the museum. They left behind footprints, fingerprints, and their shadows were caught by a security camera inside the museum. After eighty-one minutes, they left the museum with fifteen priceless jewels including sapphires, rubies, emeralds, topaz, and diamonds. Local authorities are now asking for the community’s help to solve the Mystery at the Museum. Are you up for the challenge?To learn more about the Mystery at the Museum, visit the FAQ’s.Share with your Friends:More The heist at the Teague-Ulmer Museum in Waldenburk is being named the biggest jewel theft in history and one of the great unsolved mysteries of the museum world. Many theories have surfaced as to where the stolen jewels have been hidden, but investigators have still not retrieved them. New evidence has recently revealed itself and the authorities need your help to find the stolen jewels. Watch the video to learn more.
Banks No Longer Willing to Provide Construction LoansISSAQUAH, WA — Construction of the Z-Home project, a ten-unit zero-energy housing development in Issaquah, Washington, has been halted by the credit crunch, according to the Issaquah Press. The project’s two main developers are the City of Issaquah and Howland Homes of Shoreline, Washington, with further help from Puget Sound Energy, King County Built Green, and the Washington State University Energy Program.Among the planned features of the Z-Home buildings are 11-inch-thick cellulose-filled double-stud walls, ground-source heat pumps, rooftop photovoltaic arrays, and real-time energy monitors with living-room displays. Construction of the Z-Home townhouse project, touted as “the first multi-unit zero-energy project in the country,” was announced last fall before all of the necessary financing had been secured.“The day the stock market dropped 800 points was the day of our groundbreaking,” said Brad Liljequist, the Zero Energy Project Manager for the city of Issaquah. “It was stunning. Within a two-week period, we went from a number of banks saying, ‘Yes, we’re on board and we’re interested,’ to banks saying, ‘No, we can’t do it.’ ” Liljequist says that the planned October 2009 completion date for the Z-Home townhouses now “looks doubtful.”The Issaquah Press story quoted David Fujimoto, Issaquah’s resource conservation office manager. “The Bank of America is not doing any lending for home construction on the West Coast,” Fujimoto said. “It’s a volatile time.” For more information on Issaquah’s zero-energy project, visit www.z-home.org.
Rethinking the GridSolar Power Alone Won’t Solve Energy or Climate NeedsCan Solar Power Solve the Coal Problem?Is Nuclear Power Our Energy Future or a Dinosaur? Long-term picture is still positive for renewablesSteadily declining prices for renewable energy point to continued adoption, despite provisions in the pending legislation. The wind and solar industries have been expecting a gradual loss of federal tax subsidies over the next several years, but if the changes are sudden, fewer projects would be started and electricity prices would go up in markets already committed to putting more renewable energy on the grid.The debate comes at a time when the production of solar electricity is surging. PV Magazine reports that solar electricity grew by 47% in the first nine months of the year over the same period a year ago.Citing figures from the U.S. Energy Information Agency, the magazine said that solar electric output in every single state had increased. Some states more than doubled the amount of solar electricity they generate. California is still the leader with more than five times the output of Arizona, the number two state.The growth of residential solar was 32% from 2016 to 2017, with the PV’s overall market share rising from 1.3% to 1.9%. RELATED ARTICLES Republican tax bills now in the hands of congressional negotiators would weaken a variety of federal incentives for renewable energy, but a lot is riding on a final version of the bill the GOP hopes to pass by the end of the year. The New York Times reports that wind and solar are two of the fastest growing energy sources in the country and provided 7% of the country’s electricity last year. Renewable energy is now less expensive than power provided by fossil fuel plants in some parts of the country as costs for wind and solar facilities continue to decline.But both the House and Senate versions of the tax overhaul would make renewables less attractive. An analysis by the Rhodium Group shows that the two versions of the bill affect wind, solar, and other energy sources in different ways. House and Senate conferees are now trying to come up with a single version of the bill.Many of the changes would affect utility-scale projects, although some would have an impact on small-scale facilities. For example, the House bill extends the 30% investment tax credit for small wind projects through 2021 before phasing it out. But it requires a plan for continuous construction rather than simply starting construction in order to claim the credit, a disadvantage. For solar energy, the House bill would make it harder for developers to get projects on the books before 2020 when the 30% credit begins to drop. For both solar and wind energy, the Senate’s inclusion of a provision called Base Erosion Anti-Abuse Tax, or BEAT, designed to stop big companies from shifting profits overseas, would have the effect of reducing the value of current investment tax credits. That could dry up financing for many solar and wind projects.If you’re thinking about buying an electric vehicle, start rooting for the Senate’s version of the bill. It keeps the $7,500 federal credit while the House version eliminates it.Reaction has been predictably mixed.At a recent White House event aimed at giving a plug to the GOP tax plan, a coal plant employee from North Dakota thanked President Trump for the House plan to cut the production tax credit for wind because the credit has “destroyed” the energy market. “Wind production has really eroded our state tax base and replaced coal production when it comes to electricity production,” Jessica Unruh told the president.On the other hand, the American Wind Energy Association warns of a sharp decline in wind installations if the Republican plan passes.“We would see a drastic drop-off in wind installations,” Michael Goggin, the senior director of research at the American Wind Energy Association told The Times. “We’re already seeing orders put on hold and projects not able to get refinancing. Even the threat of this bill is having a chilling effect.”
Shanghai: Chinese and US negotiators held their first face-to-face talks Wednesday since agreeing to a trade war truce last month, but the short meeting in Shanghai was overshadowed by a Twitter tirade from President Donald Trump. Washington and Beijing have so far hit each other with punitive tariffs covering more than USD 360 billion in two-way trade in a row centred on demands for China to curb the alleged theft of American technology and provide a level playing field to US companies. Also Read – Saudi Crown Prince ‘snubbed’ Pak PM, recalled jet from US US Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin shook hands and exchanged pleasantries with Vice Premier Liu He Wednesday morning. The group then went behind closed doors for around four hours in the first face-to-face negotiations since Trump agreed to a truce with his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping in June following a breakdown a month earlier. The talks were relatively brief and the group emerged later, a little earlier than expected, for a group photo before the US trade officials left for the airport without speaking to reporters. Also Read – Record number of 35 candidates in fray for SL Presidential polls Lighthizer and Mnuchin arrived in Shanghai on Tuesday and joined Chinese officials for dinner and informal discussions – just as Trump took to Twitter to lambast what he said was a lack of willingness by Beijing to broker a fair deal. “My team is negotiating with them now, but they always change the deal in the end to their benefit,” Trump wrote Tuesday. This time the US leader said Beijing was supposed to start buying US agricultural products but they have shown “no signs that they are doing so”. “That is the problem with China, they just don’t come through,” he added. Trump had previously accused China of reneging on its commitments when previous talks broke down in May. Analysts said his remarks would do little to ease the already-tense relationship between Washington and Beijing. “Whatever shred of optimism markets had about the ongoing trade negotiations were dealt as a severe blow when President Trump flew off the handle again,” said Stephen Innes, managing partner at VM Markets Singapore. “(The tweets show) Trump seems eager to get a deal, that shows his weakness,” said Shanghai-based professor Shen Dingli. A commentary in the Communist Party mouthpiece People’s Daily on Wednesday, while not mentioning Trump by name, complained that as the talks started, “the drums of some Americans struck again on the side, disturbing the main melody”. Days before the Shanghai meeting, Trump threatened to pull recognition of China’s developing nation status at the World Trade Organization, which Beijing called “arrogance”. Expectations were already low before the talks, although and analysts predicted that little of substance would be announced. “The short duration of the current meeting to me suggests that this is exploratory,” said J Michael Cole, a Taipei-based senior fellow with the Global Taiwan Institute in Washington. “It signals that no major breakthroughs are expected and that the expectations of achievements are modest at best.” Officials on both sides were keeping a low profile throughout their Shanghai trip. US trade negotiators entered and left their hotel on Shanghai’s waterfront through side doors without going through public areas, and did not stop to speak to the press or show their faces. Trump said last week he believed Beijing was hoping to delay a deal until after the US presidential election in November 2020, saying China wanted to see if a Democratic opponent wins the vote so it could “continue to rip off the USA”. “He (Trump) can’t afford politically to step up and say ‘I made a great deal with China’ when it’s not a great deal,” said Derek M Scissors, resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute. “So the most likely outcome is we get nothing until the election.” But the trade war is taking its toll on both sides. In a report published Wednesday in official news agency Xinhua, The Political Bureau of China’s Central Committee warned of “new risks and increasing downward pressure” on the Chinese economy.
Advertisement Running off to join the circus sounds like avenue of the carefree, what one would do instead of, say, getting a 9-5 job. But after an hour backstage at Cirque du Soleil’s touring arena production of Corteo, you’d be hard-pressed to find anyone who works harder to create something that feels and looks so magically effortless.Hours before the curtain is scheduled to rise, the arena is abuzz with activity. A giant teeter-totter sits in the middle of the stage and a team of strong young men take turns leaping on and off of it, higher and higher in the air. The rehearsal playlist includes “Champagne Supernova” and, appropriately enough, “Jump.” Backstage, a performer works out some choreography with her spotter. A six-foot tall chandelier made of steel and decked out with sturdy acrylic beads sits in the corner. A very muscular shirtless gentleman warms up by lifting weights. A young woman casually juggles bowling pins next to a pair of beds that are actually trampolines.When the muscular gentleman starts to spin around the stage in a giant metal hoop (the Cyr wheel, more about that in a minute), it strikes me that it’s almost more impressive to see such physical feats performed outside of the magical bubble of the show. These are real people in warm-up clothes, leaping, spinning, flipping, twisting to the very edges of physical possibility. Login/Register With: A member of Cirque du Soleil’s Corteo show performs on the high bar during practice for the show at Toronto’s Scotia Bank Centre. PETER J THOMPSON/NATIONAL POSTTiming is Everything“I was originally a trampolinist…so I could already do a lot of the flips and flying through the air,” says Harvey Donnelly, one of the acrobats featured in the teeterboard act. “The next thing to learn is how do you get those flips onto that piece of apparatus. And that’s the hardest thing is learning the timing of the teeterboard and learning how to jump off at the right time, and how to land back on.”Spinning and FallingThe Cyr Wheel is a steel circle large enough to frame a human body spread-eagled like Da Vinci’s Vitruvian Man. It’s named after Canadian circus performer Daniel Cyr, who is credited with reinventing it for the circus. Performers frame themselves in the circle and roll around the stage, sometimes at a leisurely pace, sometimes at a manic spin. It’s dizzying to watch, much less to be in.Donnelly joined Cirque du Soleil on the strength of his trampolining skills. It was only after he was hired that he learned how to use the Cyr Wheel. “I’m not going to lie, that is a lot of spinning and falling, spinning and falling,” he says. “I thought that there was some secret potion, some trick, but there’s not, there’s just getting it, spin until you know how to keep spinning and then once you work out the timing, you got it.”As for how many weeks of spinning and falling before he got it, Harvey is modest. “The truth is, if you ask any circus performer how long it took them to ‘get it’, the first thing you think is ‘I’m still trying to get it!’ But really to get a comfortable spin and not fall on my bum, it took me about six weeks.” A performer uses a hoop during practice for the show. PETER J THOMPSON/NATIONAL POSTThe CostumeWhile Donnelly is spinning (not falling, at least not on my watch) onstage, Catherine Duval, the assistant head of wardrobe, is backstage mending tears, replacing buttons and generally making sure the hundreds of costumes in her charge are clean and – more importantly – safe for the performers to wear each night. The costumes evolve when new cast members join and develop their performance. “After training you can feel how the costume lives,” says Duval. “It always depends what is the act onstage, but for us here it’s important that everybody be comfortable and safe – we need to check all the costumes each day to make sure they have no holes, or missing buttons.”Duval and her team are also on hand as dressers for the cast. “We zip, unzip, untie – everything,” she says. “There are some quick changes…we have the grand angels at the end, and when they come out of the stage, there are big wings and we need to unclip, undress and it’s really quick. It’s not stressful, but it’s a really quick one – we need to be on time.”Suspended pole performer Stephanie Ortega of France practices. PETER J THOMPSON/NATIONAL POSTThe Lights“About once a week, we will rehearse our teeterboard in our show lights,” says Donnelly. “We prefer not to be in our show lights, simply because it’s so hot. In the show you’ll watch us to a six or seven minute full acrobatic act in a jam-packed arena under the lights, and by the time we come offstage we’re dripping with sweat!”The stage lights may make the acrobats sweat, but they’re also obviously a key part of the magical transition. The chandeliers, for example, are made of steel and dripping with clear acrylic beads that the acrobats dangle from. Backstage, one of them sits on the ground, at least four feet in girth and almost six in height. The steel looks firm and strong, and the beads are sturdy – but from out in the audience, the lights transform acrylic and steel into sparkling crystal and brass.Juggler Johan Jusslin of Finland. PETER J THOMPSON/NATIONAL POSTThe Moment Before“I’m in a team of five guys, so we’re always warming up together,” says Donnelly. “Minutes before we hit the stage we’ll talk through our act, so we walk and talk our way through it. We stretch, warm up, usually joking. But we’ll always take a minute or two of silence to go through everything in our heads. But really the best way I can describe it is, the moment you hit the stage it’s like, have you ever dived into a cold pool? You know the moment your feet leave the edge of the pool but you haven’t hit the water yet? When we step on stage, we’ve jumped into the cold pool.”SPECIAL TO NATIONAL POST Facebook Advertisement LEAVE A REPLY Cancel replyLog in to leave a comment Twitter Advertisement All in a day’s work at Cirque du Soleil’s traveling production of Corteo.What comes first, the apparatus or the acrobat?Julie Dionne is one of the acrobats in the big chandelier act, and she has been with Corteo off and on since the beginning, having worked on the show’s original development in 2004. “Because our apparatus is already so dramatic, they’re huge chandeliers, so it gives a tone to the act already,” she says. “And then in creation…it was a lot of research with a new apparatus, the physical vocabulary.” Sometimes they’d come up with moves that were beautiful, but couldn’t be seen amid the lines of the chandelier. “There’s two ways – you put yourself in a good mood, the ambiance, and you find the vocabulary, or you go very technically, ‘what can I do as an acrobat and what does that express?’”